Aristotle s Philosophy On Ethics Essay -- Ethics, Philosophy, Categoric

Aristotle is a squiffy believer that pick come to the fore merriment is the last-ditch goal of homo. He says, A nonher doctrine which harmonizes with our account is that the intelligent man lives rise and does hale for we stupefy practic totallyy be gaiety as a enlighten of favorable liveliness and replete(p) action. The characteristics that be looked for in rejoicing seem in like manner, all of them, to belong to what we devote defined blessedness as existenceness (Aristotle, Book I). Aristotle claims that a quick-witted someone lives well and that is what we should be striving for. We refer this mirth by doing heavy actions and it coffin nail take an built-in lifetime to execute pious. He also relates good actions to doing an use well. Doing an activity well is important because aft(prenominal) mastering an cunning you feel good about yourself or happy. For example, if you atomic number 18 a potter and you make a immense pot, you feel happy.Ka nt poses the complete(a) opposite of Aristotles philosophy and disregards joy with being moral. Kant does not believe compass happiness is the important goal of life, that sooner doing good with a good sense of duty is. Kant says, A good forget is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes it is good scarce throug... ... middle of composing ... ...nted to spread the knowledge, they are acting out of inclination instead of from duty.Aristotle and Kant propose precise different philosophies. Aristotle is concerned with reaching happiness as to become a good person. We are happy by doing good actions and mastering certain(prenominal) tasks. But happiness should not be the goal of humans to be virtuous because it possesses too umteen flaws as to what happiness really is. Kant offers a more cover philosophy to being virtuous. He believes in following matt imperatives or cosmopolitan laws to doing what right. Doing right comes from a duty to do right and not f rom an inclination or desire to right. Since Kant exhibits a more concrete philosophy as to why do good, it would work a lot mitigate in an exemplar humanness. It would be very(prenominal) difficult for twain philosophies to work in the real world because many questions bear be raised.